4.7 Article

Multi-objective scheduling for scientific workflow in multicloud environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 108-122

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.03.028

关键词

Multicloud environment; Multi-objective optimization; Workflow scheduling; Particle swarm optimization; Reliability

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61572162, 61572251, 61702144]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial National Science Foundation of China [LQ17F020003]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Key Science and Technology Project Foundation [2018C01012]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0800803]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Providing resources and services from multiple clouds is becoming an increasingly promising paradigm. Workflow applications are becoming increasingly computation-intensive or data-intensive, with its resource requirement being maintained from multicloud environment in terms of pay-per-use pricing mechanism. Existing works of cloud workflow scheduling primarily target optimizing makespan or cost. However, the reliability of workflow scheduling is also a critical concern and even the most important metric of QoS (quality of service). In this paper, a multi-objective scheduling (MOS) algorithm for scientific workflow in multicloud environment is proposed, the aim of which is to minimize workflow makespan and cost simultaneously while satisfying the reliability constraint. The proposed MOS algorithm is according to particle swarm optimization (PSO) technology, and the corresponding coding strategy takes both the tasks execution location and tasks order of data transmission into consideration. On the basis of real-world scientific workflow models, extensive simulation experiments demonstrate the significant multi-objective performances improvement of MOS algorithm over the CMOHEFT algorithm and the RANDOM algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据