4.5 Article

Ah Receptor-Mediated Suppression of Liver Regeneration through NC-XRE-Driven p21Cip1 Expression

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 85, 期 4, 页码 533-541

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.113.089730

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R01-ES07800, P30-ES006676, T32-ES007254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies in hepatocyte-derived cell lines and the whole liver established that the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) can disrupt G1-phase cell cycle progression following exposure to persistent AhR agonists, such as TCDD (dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin). Growth arrest was attributed to inhibition of G1-phase cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activity. The present study examined the effect of TCDD exposure on liver regeneration following 70% partial hepatectomy in mice lacking the Cip/Kip inhibitors p21(Cip1) or p27(Kip1) responsible for regulating CDK2 activity. Assessment of the regenerative process in wild-type, p21(Cip1) knockout, and p27(Kip1) knockout mice confirmed that TCDD-induced inhibition of liver regeneration is entirely dependent on p21(Cip1) expression. Compared with wild-type mice, the absence of p21(Cip1) expression completely abrogated the TCDD inhibition, and accelerated hepatocyte progression through G(1) phase during the regenerative process. Analysis of the transcriptional response determined that increased p21(Cip1) expression during liver regeneration involved an AhR-dependent mechanism. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies revealed that p21(Cip1) induction required AhR binding to the newly characterized nonconsensus xenobiotic response element, in conjunction with the tumor suppressor protein Kruppel-like factor 6 functioning as an AhR binding partner. The evidence also suggests that AhR functionality following partial hepatectomy is dependent on a p21(Cip1)-regulated signaling process, intimately linking AhR biology to the G(1)-phase cell cycle program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据