4.5 Article

Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies

期刊

HUMAN RELATIONS
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 389-411

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0018726713495284

关键词

virtual teams; computer-mediated communication and collaboration; task awareness; non-routine task; collaborative information technology; presence awareness; situational awareness

资金

  1. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  2. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1219832] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasingly, geographically dispersed teams are relying exclusively on sophisticated information and communication technologies (ICTs) to coordinate their knowledge. Current research argues that the reliance on the technology (versus face-to-face) for communication may inhibit geographically distributed team performance. In contrast, we argue that previous research associates negative performance effects with the level or degree of exclusive reliance on ICT without regard to the specific form or ways in which team members use ICT. We hypothesize that teams will be more successful when they use ICT to specifically facilitate the situational awareness needs created by their teams' composition and task. We studied 54 geographically dispersed teams that all relied exclusively on ICT (with minimal to no face-to-face interactions) for coordination in order to control for the effect of the level of reliance on ICTs. Our multi-source/multi-method study demonstrates that the form of use can have a positive association with team performance even in teams relying exclusively on ICT depending on the team composition and nature of task being performed. Our findings suggest that, instead of assuming that technology reliance negatively impacts team performance, researchers studying distributed teams should separate the level of reliance (degree of use) from form of reliance (type of use) on ICT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据