4.4 Article

Berberine protects renal tubular cells against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury via the Sirt1/p53 pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 715-723

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11418-018-1210-1

关键词

Berberine; Kidney; Hypoxia/reoxygenation; Sirtunin 1; p53

资金

  1. Science and Technology Foundation of Tianjin Health Bureau [16KG101, 13KG105]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81700569, 81700659]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [17JCYBJC28000]
  4. Integrated Western and Chinese Science Foundation of Tianjin Health Bureau [2017056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Berberine (BBR) has been demonstrated to protect against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury; however, the underlying molecular mechanism is largely unknown. In the present study, we examined the role of silent information regulator 1 (Sirt1)/p53 in the protective effect of BBR on hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction in rat renal tubular epithelial cells (NRK-52E cells). NRK-52E cells were preconditioned with small interfering RNA targeting Sirt1 (Sirt1-siRNA) and BBR before subjected to H/R. Cell damage was assessed by CCK8 assay and detection of oxidative parameters. The apoptotic rate was determined by flow cytometry and Hoechst 33258 staining. The expression of apoptotic markers, Sirt1, p53 and the translocation of p53 were examined by Western blotting assay. Nuclear p53 deacetylation by Sirt1 was detected using immunoprecipitation. Compared with the H/R group, BBR pretreatment increased cell viability and inhibited mitochondrial oxidative stress and apoptosis. Protein expression of Sirt1 was also enhanced along with a reduction of p53. Furthermore, both nuclear translocation of p53 and its acetylation were inhibited in NRK-52E cells pretreated with BBR. However, the knockdown of Sirt1 counteracted the renoprotection of BBR. BBR preconditioning protects rat renal tubular epithelial cells against H/R-induced mitochondrial dysfunction via regulating the Sirt1/p53 pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据