4.2 Article

Green Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Gold Nanoparticles/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites Prepared By Tannic Acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 2536-2546

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2018.14389

关键词

Green Synthesis; Tannic Acid; Gold Nanoparticles; Graphene Oxide; 4-Nitrophenol Reduction Reaction

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (Ministry of Education) [NRF-2015R1D1A1A09059054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tannic acid is a phenolic compound that is abundant in plants. Five different concentrations of tannic acid were used as a reducing agent to synthesize gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Three kinds of AuNPs were prepared to evaluate their catalytic activity for the 4-nitrophenol reduction reaction in the presence of sodium borohydride: (i) Colloidal solutions of AuNPs synthesized using tannic acid as a reducing agent (TA-AuNPs), (ii) Nanoparticlesmade by centrifuging the colloidal solution of TA-AuNPs followed by re-dispersion with deionized water (cf-TA-AuNPs), and (iii) Nanoparticlesmade by the in situ crystallization of TA-AuNPs on graphene oxide (TA-AuNPs-GO). TA-AuNPs, cf-TA-AuNPs and TA-AuNPs-GO exhibited a characteristic surface plasmon resonance band at 527 similar to 564 nm. High resolution transmission electron microscopy images revealed spherical-shaped nanoparticles. The rate constants of 4-nitrophenol reduction reaction increased for all three types of AuNPs with decreasing tannic acid concentration used during the synthetic process. The rate constants of cf-TA-AuNPs and TA-AuNPs-GO increased 1.45 similar to 1.64-fold and 2.25 similar to 4.49-fold, respectively, compared with the rate constants of TA-AuNPs. The conversion yields from 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol in the presence of the cf-TA-AuNPs catalysts were measured using reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. The conversion yield was excellent in a range of 97.57 similar to 99.43%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据