4.2 Article

Synthesis of Magnetic CoFe2O4 Nanoparticles and Their Efficient Degradation of Diclofenac by Activating Persulfate via Formation of Sulfate Radicals

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 6942-6948

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2018.15800

关键词

CoFe2O4; Diclofenac; Persulfates; Sulfate Radicals

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508254, 41771341]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of Gansu Province of China [1506RJZA216]
  3. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure [SKL201509SIC]
  4. Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Cleaning Materials [KFK1502]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  6. Key Laboratory of Comprehensive and Highly Efficient Utilization of Salt Lake Resources, Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, magnetic CoFe2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized by hydrothermal method by using ferric nitrate and cobalt nitrate as raw materials. Subsequently, physicochemical properties of the resulting CoFe2O4 nanoparticles were systematically studied by scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction, N-2 adsorption/desorption, Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy and Vibration sample magnetometer measurement. Results indicated that CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with cubic spinel structure possessed an average diameter of 6.9 nm, specific surface area of 103.48 m(2) . g(-1), saturation magnetization of 54.65 A . m(2) (emu . g(-1)) and coercivity of 1.76x10(4) A . m(-1). Furthermore, scavenging experiments revealed that sulfate radicals ((SO4-)-S-center dot) was the main active species derived from persulfates, in which 72.3% of diclofenac could be degraded within 30 min treatment. This study provides a promising strategy to synthesize versatile catalyst which would be potentially applied in pharmaceutical wastewater purification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据