4.4 Article

Multiple programmed cell death pathways are involved in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced photoreceptor degeneration

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2906-x

关键词

Retinal degeneration; MNU; Photoreceptors; Mouse; Activity assays; PCD; Caspases; Calpain; ER stress

资金

  1. Fritz Tobler Foundation
  2. Bern University Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify programmed cell death (PCD) pathways involved in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced photoreceptor (PR) degeneration. Adult C57BL/6 mice received a single MNU i.p. injection (60 mg/kg bodyweight), and were observed over a period of 7 days. Degeneration was visualized by H&E overview staining and electron microscopy. PR cell death was measured by quantifying TUNEL-positive cells in the outer nuclear layer (ONL). Activity measurements of key PCD enzymes (calpain, caspases) were used to identify the involved cell death pathways. Furthermore, the expression level of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), key players in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced apoptosis, was analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR. A decrease in ONL thickness and the appearance of apoptotic PR nuclei could be detected beginning 3 days post-injection (PI). This was accompanied by an increase of TUNEL-positive cells. Significant upregulation of activated caspases (3, 9, 12) was found at different time periods after MNU injection. Additionally, several other players of nonconventional PCD pathways were also upregulated. Consequently, calpain activity increased in the ONL, with a maximum on day 7 PI and an upregulation of CHOP and GRP78 expression beginning on day 1 PI was found. The data indicate that regular apoptosis is the major cause of MNU-induced PR cell death. However, alternative PCD pathways, including ER stress and calpain activation, are also involved. Knowledge about the mechanisms involved in this mouse model of PR degeneration could facilitate the design of putative combinatory therapeutic approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据