4.7 Article

Molecular interactions between betaine monohydrate-glycerol deep eutectic solvents and palmitic acid: Computational and experimental studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 28-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.12.016

关键词

Betaine monohydrate; Deep eutectic solvents; Glycerol; Molecular dynamics simulation; Palmitic acid; Spectroscopic

资金

  1. Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (Doctoral Dissertation) [552/UN.19.5.1.3/LT/2016]
  2. Universitas Indonesia (PITTA)
  3. Laboratory of Biomedical Computation, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, deep eutectic solvents (DES) have received great attention as green media, thus suitable for use for several different applications, such as reactions, separations and purifications. DES are formed by mixing the quaternary ammonium salt and the hydrogen bond donor (HBD) compound. Previous work studied the deacidification of palm oil using a betaine monohydrate-glycerol based DES as the solvent, and the results indicated that the ability of this DES to extract palmitic acid depends on the molar ratio of the salt to the HBD compound. Therefore, molecular interactions between betaine monohydrate-glycerol DES and palmitic acid at the different molar ratios of betaine monohydrate to glycerol were investigated by molecular dynamics simulation and experiments (FT-IR and NMR) in this work. The number of H-bond interactions between betaine monohydrate and glycerol molecules depends on the molar ratio of betaine monohydrate to glycerol in the DES. Based on the computational and experimental studies, the hydrogen bonding interactions between molecules were present. Palmitic acid interacts with the betaine monohydrate, and it can also possibly interact with glycerol molecules. The presence of palmitic acid in the mixtures induces an increase in the H-bond interactions between betaine and glycerol molecules. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据