4.7 Article

Effect of magnetic field treatment on interfacial tension of CTAB nano-emulsion: Developing a novel agent for enhanced oil recovery

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 107-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.111

关键词

Nano-emulsion; Surface tension; Magnetic field; Enhanced oil recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoemulsion is a novel type of emulsified solutions holding great promises for utilizing in industrial applications. Although microemulsions have been the subject of numerous studies in past decades, however, nanoemulsions are quite virgin and merit detailed investigation to scrutinize their characteristics specific to reservoir engineering, in particular, Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). To this end, the present study is an attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of a specific nanoemulsion for oil displacement through porous media. In this regard, flooding experiments were designed and Hexa decyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), which is a cationic surfactant, was used as the emulsifying agent. Throughout experiments, surface tension together with incremental oil recovery was measured. Besides flooding experiments, to explore the effect of magnetic field on macroscopic behavior of CTAB solution, all procedures were replicated by exposing CTAB solution under magnetic field with varying intensities. Encouraging observations demonstrated the concealed capability of CTAB nanoemulsion for improving the performance of conventional waterflooding process. Additionally, it was pointed out exposing CTAB solution into magnetic field slightly increased oil/nanoemulsion IFT. However, it resulted in fairly higher oil recovery than the non treated case. Since both cases were of nearly identical IFT and wettability, so we concluded that nanoemulsion is of higher viscosity while exposing to the magnetic field, which in turn gives rise to lower mobility ratio during flooding process. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据