4.5 Article

DFT investigation on the metabolic mechanisms of theophylline by cytochrome P450 monooxygenase

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 109-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.06.010

关键词

Theophylline; Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase; N-demethylation; Density functional theory; Kinetic isotope effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21203153]
  2. Sichuan Provincial Education Department [18ZA0470]
  3. China West Normal University [17YC010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Theophylline, one of the most commonly used bronchodilators and respiratory stimulators for the treatment of acute and chronic asthmatic conditions, can cause permanent neurological damage through chronic or excessive ingestion. In this work, DFT calculation was performed to identify the metabolic mechanisms of theophylline by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) monooxygenase. Two main metabolic pathways were investigated, namely, N-1-(path A) and N-3-(path B) demethylations, which proceeded through N -methyl hydroxylation followed by the decomposition of the generated carbinolamine species. N -methyl hydroxylation involved a hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) mechanism, which can be generalized as the N-demethylation mechanism of xanthine derivatives. The energy gap between the low -spin double state (LS) and the high -spin quartet state (HS) was low (<1 kcal mol(-1)), indicating a two -state reactivity (TSR) mechanism. The generated carbinolamine species preferred to decompose through the adjacent heteroatom (O-6 for path A and O-2 for path B) mediated mechanism. Path B was kinetically more feasible than path A attributed to its relatively lower activation energy. 1-Methylxanthine therefore was the energetically favorable metabolite of theophylline. The observations obtained in the work were in agreement with the experimental observation, which can offer important implications for further pharmacological and clinic studies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据