4.5 Article

Revealing the molecular interactions of aptamers that specifically bind to the extracellular domain of HER2 cancer biomarker protein: An in silico assessment

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 112-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.06.003

关键词

Aptamers; Cancer therapeutics; Cancer diagnostics; HER2; In silico; Docking; MD simulations; SELEX

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi [BIC/11(16)/2014, 2014-23020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-stranded (ss) oligonucleotide aptamers are emerging as the promising substitutes for monoclonal antibodies because of their low production cost and good batch-to-batch consistency. Aptamers vividly bind to a variety of cellular targets and alter their functions with a remarkable degree of specificities. In this study, the positive clones of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) specific binding ssDNA aptamers which were previously identified by in vitro Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment (SELEX) process, hitherto lacking the putative binding site information and residues crucial for aptamer recognition are studied. Primarily, four putative DNA binding regions present on the HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) were identified using prediction servers and electrostatic potential maps, which were further exploited to delineate the aptamer binding features. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed stable binding nature of three aptamers (H2>H1>H6), which chose Site 2a as preferred binding site present on the HER2(ECD) protein. Furthermore, amino acid residues viz. Asn37, Gln59, Arg81-Gln84, Asp88, and Lys128 of Site 2a were found to be crucial for high-affinity binding. This knowledge can be utilized as a benchmark for the future studies, in search for better and highly specific anti-HER2 aptamers as cancer therapeutics or as diagnostic agents. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据