4.3 Review

Dysfunctional signaling underlying endometriosis: current state of knowledge

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 R97-R113

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/JME-17-0227

关键词

endometriosis; inflammation; apoptosis; oxidative stress; estrogen receptor

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [5 U24 DK097748-04]
  2. Mike Hogg Foundation
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) -Ministry of Science, ICT & Future planning [NRF-2016R1C1B1006976]
  4. Dong-A University Research Fund
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [U24DK097748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It affects approximately 5-10% of women of reproductive age. Endometriosis is associated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and, often, severe pelvic pain. In addition to pain, women with endometriosis often experience infertility. Defining the molecular etiology of endometriosis is a significant challenge for improving the quality of women's lives. Unfortunately, the pathophysiology of endometriosis is not well understood. Here, we summarize the potential causative factors of endometriosis in the following three categories: (1) dysregulation of immune cells in the peritoneal fluid and endometriotic lesions; (2) alteration of apoptotic signaling in retrograde menstrual tissue and cytotoxic T cells involved in endometriosis progression and (3) dysregulation of oxidative stress. Determining the molecular etiology of these dysregulated cellular signaling pathways should provide crucial clues for understanding initiation and progression of endometriosis. Moreover, improved understanding should suggest new molecular therapeutic targets that could improve the specificity of endometriosis treatments and reduce the side effects associated with current approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据