4.3 Article

Ameliorating the in vivo antimalarial efficacy of artemether using nanostructured lipid carriers

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROENCAPSULATION
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 121-136

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02652048.2018.1441915

关键词

Cerebral malaria; artemether; cognitive deficits; brain targeting; nanostructured lipid carriers; Evans blue stain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral malaria (CM) is a fatal neurological complication of Plasmodium falciparum infection that affects children (below five years old) in sub-Saharan Africa and adults in South-East Asia each year having the fatality rate of 10-25%. The survivors of CM also have high risk of long term neurological or cognitive deficits. The objective of the present investigation was to develop optimised nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) of artemether (ARM) for enhanced anti-malarial efficacy of ARM. NLCs of ARM were prepared by a combination of high speed homogenisation (HSH) and probe sonication techniques. Preliminary solubility studies for ARM showed highest solubility in trimyristin (solid lipid), capmul MCM NF (liquid lipid) and polysorbate 80 (surfactant). Trimyristin and capmul showed superior miscibility at a ratio of 70:30.The optimised NLC formulation has the particle size (PS) of: 48.59 +/- 3.67nm, zeta potential (ZP) of: -32 +/- 1.63mV and entrapment efficiency (EE) of: 91 +/- 3.62%. In vitro cell line (human embryonic kidney fibroblast cell line (HEK 293T)) cytotoxicity studies showed that prepared formulation was non-toxic. The results of in vivo studies in CM induced mice prevented the recrudescence of parasite after administration of NLCs of ARM. Additionally, NLCs of ARM showed better parasite clearance, higher survival (60%) in comparison to ARM solution (40%). Also it was observed that lesser entrapment of Evans blue stain (prepared in PBS as solution) in the NLCs of ARM treated brains of C57BL/6 mice than ARM solution treated mice. Hence NLCs of ARM may be a better alternative for improving therapeutic efficacy than ARM solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据