4.7 Article

The record of Australian Jurassic plant-arthropod interactions

期刊

GONDWANA RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 940-959

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.11.009

关键词

Mesozoic; Arthropod damage types; Functional feeding groups; Gymnosperms; Ferns

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Swedish Research Council (VR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A survey of Australian Jurassic plant fossil assemblages reveals examples of foliar and wood damage generated by terrestrial arthropods attributed to leaf-margin feeding, surface feeding, lamina hole feeding, galling, piercing-and-sucking, leaf-mining, boring and oviposition. These types of damage are spread across a wide range of fern and gymnosperm taxa, but are particularly well represented on derived gymnosperm clades, such as Pentoxylales and Bennettitales. Several Australian Jurassic plants show morphological adaptations in the form of minute marginal and apical spines on leaves and bracts, and scales on rachises that likely represent physical defences against arthropod herbivory. Only two entomofaunal assemblages are presently known from the Australian Jurassic but these reveal a moderate range of taxa, particularly among the Orthoptera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera and Odonata, all of which are candidates for the dominant feeding traits evidenced by the fossil leaf and axis damage. The survey reveals that plant-arthropod interactions in the Jurassic at middle to high southern latitudes of southeastern Gondwana incorporated a similar diversity of feeding strategies to those represented in coeval communities from other provinces. Further, the range of arthropod damage types is similar between Late Triassic and Jurassic assemblages from Gondwana despite substantial differences in the major plant taxa, implying that terrestrial invertebrate herbivores were able to successfully transfer to alternative plant hosts during the floristic turnovers at the Triassic-Jurassic transition. (C) 2013 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据