4.7 Article

Bioinspired synthesis of pDA@GO-based molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes assembled with dendrites-like Ag microspheres for high-selective adsorption and separation of ibuprofen

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 553, 期 -, 页码 151-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.043

关键词

PDA@GO; Dendrites-like 3D Ag microspheres; Molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes; Perm-selectivity performance; Ibuprofen

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1507118, U1407123, 21406085]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20151350, BK20140580, BK20161367, BK20150536]
  3. Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong province [2013B010404044]
  4. Education project of Guangdong Province [2013KJCX0107, 2016KTSCX067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired from the highly bioadhesive performance of polydopamine (pDA)-based layers, a facile method was developed to modify GO nanosheets with pDA (pDA@GO). The key design of the molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes (MINMs) was integrated pDA@GO nanosheets into the porous PVDF membranes as the highly adjustable active domains. Dendrites-like 3D Ag microspheres were obtained on the surface of nanosheets-infiltrated nanocomposite membranes (NS-NMs) to obtain high performance membranes. The as-prepared pDA coating layers not only modified GO nanosheets, but also could be used as a versatile platform for the further immobilizing dendrites-like 3D Ag microspheres on the surface of NS-NMs to improve anti-fouling property. Attribute to the highly adjustable active domains and dendrites-like 3D Ag microspheres, the as-prepared MINMs revealed an outstanding adsorption amount (61.55 mg g(-1)), a better hydrophilicity and regenerability. Most importantly, excellent perm-selectivity performance (beta(ketoprofen/ibuprofen) and beta(naproxen) (sodium/ibuprofen) were 6.55 and 6.63, respectively) could be also achieved, which is beneficial to adsorb and separate of ibuprofen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据