4.7 Article

Fouling mitigation in tubular membranes by 3D-printed turbulence promoters

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 554, 期 -, 页码 156-163

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.015

关键词

Turbulence promoters; Static mixers; Rapid prototyping; Fouling mitigation; Ceramic membrane

资金

  1. ERA-NET SUSFOOD-CEREAL project [031A431B]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon research and innovation program [694946]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite intensive research, fouling remains a severe problem in membrane filtration. It is often controlled by applying turbulent flow which requires a higher energy consumption. So-called turbulence promoters or static mixers can be inserted into the flow channel of tubular membranes. They deflect the fluid, induce vortices, enhance particle back-transport and increase the shear rate at the membrane surface, thus mitigating fouling. However, little is known how the geometry of such turbulence promotors affects the reduction of fouling. We investigate how different 3D-printed mixer geometries affect fouling and improve the flux during filtration with humic acid. Most mixer geometries used in the present study are based on a twisted tape; a Kenics static mixer is investigated as well. Static mixers with changing diameter prove to be less effective than twisted tape mixers with constant diameter which lead to an increase in permeate flux of around 130%. The highest flux improvement of 140% can be reached by applying a Kenics mixer. Regardless of their geometry, all investigated static mixer cause higher permeate fluxes at same specific energy consumption. Again, the Kenics mixer proves to be the most efficient static mixer. The presented mixer geometries can be fabricated with undercut injection molding techniques and represent a simple and viable option to make tubular membrane based filtration processes more efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据