4.7 Article

Tozasertib Analogues as Inhibitors of Necroptotic Cell Death

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 5, 页码 1895-1920

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01449

关键词

-

资金

  1. fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) [G078713N]
  2. FWO [11Z815N, 11Z817N, 1S42616N]
  3. Institute for the promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT) [141554]
  4. Methusalem grant [BOF09/01M00709, BOF16/MET_V/007]
  5. Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB)
  6. Ghent University (MRP)
  7. Foundation against Cancer [2012-188, FAF-F/2016/865]
  8. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (FWO) [FWO G.0875.11, FWO G.0A45.12N, FWO G.0787.13N, FWO G.0C37.14N, FWO G.0E04.16N]
  9. Flemish Government [BOF09/01M00709, BOF16/MET_V/007]
  10. Belgian science policy office (BELSPO) [IAP 7/32]
  11. FWO
  12. Flemish Government, department EWI
  13. FWO Excellence of Science program [G0G6618N (EOS ID 30826052)]
  14. University of Antwerp

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) plays a crucial role in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced necroptosis, suggesting that this pathway might be druggable. Most inhibitors of RIPK1 are classified as either type II or type III kinase inhibitors. This opened up some interesting perspectives for the discovery of novel inhibitors that target the active site of RIPK1. Tozasertib, a type I pan-aurora kinase (AurK) inhibitor, was found to show a very high affinity for RIPK1. Because tozasertib presents the typical structural elements of a type I kinase inhibitor, the development of structural analogues of tozasertib is a good starting point for identifying novel type I RIPK1 inhibitors. In this paper, we identified interesting inhibitors of mTNF-induced necroptosis with no significant effect on AurK A and B, resulting in no nuclear abnormalities as is the case for tozasertib. Compounds 71 and 72 outperformed tozasertib in an in vivo TNF-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) mouse model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据