4.3 Article

Rickettsia Species Isolated from Dermacentor occidentalis (Acari: Ixodidae) from California

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 1555-1560

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjy100

关键词

Pacific Coast tick; Dermacentor occidentalis; Rickettsia 364D; Rickettsia philipii; Rickettsia rhipicephali; Rickettsia bellii; California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pacific Coast tick (Dermacentor occidentalis Marx, 1892) is one of the most widely distributed and frequently encountered tick species in California. This tick is the primary vector of an unclassified spotted fever group rickettsial pathogen, designated currently as Rickettsia 364D, the etiologic agent of a recently recognized tick-borne rickettsiosis known as Pacific Coast tick fever. Despite intensified interest in this pathogen, important questions remain regarding its taxonomic status and possible variations in genotype among different strains that could influence its pathogenicity. Only the extensively passaged prototypical isolate (strain 364-D) is widely available to rickettsiologists and public health scientists worldwide. To achieve a larger, more geographically diverse, and contemporary collection of strains, 1,060 questing adult D. occidentalis ticks were collected from 18 sites across six counties in northern and southern California in 2016 and 2017. Fourteen ticks (1.3%) yielded DNA of Rickettsia 364D and from these, 10 unique isolates from Lake and Orange counties were obtained. Additionally, Rickettsia rhipicephali was detected in 108 (10.2%) ticks, from which eight isolates were obtained, and Rickettsia bellii in six (0.6%), from which three isolates were obtained. The panel of recently acquired, low-passage strains of Rickettsia 364D derived from this study could enhance opportunities for investigators to accurately determine the taxonomic standing of this agent and to develop specific diagnostic assays for detecting infections with Rickettsia 364D in ticks and humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据