4.2 Article

Differentiation Between Normal and Cancerous Human Urothelial Cell Lines Using Micro-Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy at Multiple Frequencies

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-018-0426-6

关键词

Diagnostic equipment; Lab-on-a-chip devices; Electrodes; Engineering; Technology; Impedance

资金

  1. Biomedical Integrated Technology Research Project through Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology in 2016
  2. BioNano Health-Guard Research Center - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) of Korea [H-GUARD 2015M3A6B2063547]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study aims to investigate differences in impedance between normal (SV-HUC-1) and cancerous (TCCSUP) human urothelial cell lines at multiple frequencies by using a micro-electrical impedance spectroscopy (mu EIS) device. A mu EIS device was designed to measure the impedance of SV-HUC-1 and TCCSUP cells as the cells passed the sensing electrodes in the microfluidic channel. The cellular impedance was measured at frequencies of 10, 50, 100, 500kHz, and 1MHz, and the impedance values were compared at each frequency to investigate differences between the two cell lines. Additionally, the linear correlation between impedance and frequency was analyzed. The number of SV-HUC-1 and TCCSUP cells measured was 13 and 9, 21 and 10, 16 and 24, 8 and 8, and 11 and 22 cells at the frequencies of 10, 50, 100, 500kHz, and 1MHz, respectively. TCCSUP had significantly smaller amplitudes than SV-HUC-1 at 10, 50, and 100kHz (p=0.030, p=0.031, and p<0.001, respectively). Moreover, significant differences in phase angle were observed between cell lines at 100, 500kHz, and 1MHz (p<0.001 in all). A significant difference between cell lines in terms of amplitude and phase angle was observed concurrently at 100kHz. The amplitude of both the cell lines was negatively correlated to frequency, while the phase angle presented no correlation. In conclusion, the mu EIS device could effectively differentiate between SV-HUC-1 and TCCSUP on the basis of their impedance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据