4.3 Article

Energetic walking gaits studied by a simple actuated inverted pendulum model

期刊

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 2273-2281

出版社

KOREAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-018-0438-8

关键词

Efficient gait; Actuated inverted pendulum model; Passive dynamics walking; Biped locomotion; Walking robot

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1713211, 61673300]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [16ZR1424600]
  3. Chongqing Research Program of Basic Science and Advanced Technology [cstc2015jcyjA40041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical structure and the joint torques configuration are the important parts in the biped robot design. Meanwhile, different walking speed and step length should be chosen to achieve efficient gait according to different need of walking environment. Therefore, this paper investigates the energetic walking gaits using a simple actuated inverted pendulum model. Joint torques and push-off impulse are both added in the model. The walking gaits with different joint torques configuration and with different combination of walking speeds and step lengths are analyzed. The results show that hip velocity direction is changed by the push-off impulse just before the heelstrike, which reduces the energy consumption of each step. The walking gait with minimal energy consumption is the walking pattern only with push-off, the energy cost of which is 1/4 of the walking pattern only with joint torque during the swing phase. The cost of transport (COT) and the push-off impulse of the walking gait is increasing with the increase of walking speed and step length. Using same value of push-off impulse, the walking with long step length and slow speed is more efficient. The paper can provide suggestions for designing advanced legged robot systems with high energy efficiency and various gaits. For example, the consideration of push-off mechanism can be used in the biped robots design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据