4.2 Article

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors' passage into human milk of lactating women

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 18, 页码 3020-3025

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1455180

关键词

Human milk; lactation; pregnancy; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are commonly used for the treatment of pregnancy-related and postnatal depression. However, only a few studies have evaluated the passage of these drugs into human milk, often with conflicting results. Here, we sought to evaluate the passage of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors into human milk in the first days after delivery and their potential association with neonatal outcomes.Study design: The passage of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors into human milk was expressed both as percentage of milk-to-plasma ratio of drug concentrations and as the relative infant dose (RID). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry.Results: Nineteen women treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during the third trimester of pregnancy and lactation were considered. Human milk-to-plasma ratios ranged from 51.1% to 703.4%. The patients had a median RID of 1.5%, with differences among the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. All newborns had been breastfed from birth up to day three of life. At 1week follow up, 58% of infants were breastfed, 37% were complementary fed, and 5% were formula fed. No side effects due to passage of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors into human milk were found.Conclusions: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were detected in human milk, with milk-to-plasma ratios which in some cases exceeded 100%. Given the need for maternal therapy and the low incidence of neonatal adverse events, it is advisable not to preclude breastfeeding a priori but recommend it with careful follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据