4.7 Review

Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications

期刊

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 276-292

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12268

关键词

Ecological niche model; habitat model; imperfect detection; presence-absence; presence-background; presence-only; prevalence; sampling bias

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
  2. National Environment Research Program (NERP) Environmental Decisions Hub
  3. ARC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species distribution models (SDMs) are used to inform a range of ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications. However, users often underestimate the strong links between data type, model output and suitability for end-use. We synthesize current knowledge and provide a simple framework that summarizes how interactions between data type and the sampling process (i.e. imperfect detection and sampling bias) determine the quantity that is estimated by a SDM. We then draw upon the published literature and simulations to illustrate and evaluate the information needs of the most common ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications of SDM outputs. We find that, while predictions of models fitted to the most commonly available observational data (presence records) suffice for some applications, others require estimates of occurrence probabilities, which are unattainable without reliable absence records. Our literature review and simulations reveal that, while converting continuous SDM outputs into categories of assumed presence or absence is common practice, it is seldom clearly justified by the application's objective and it usually degrades inference. Matching SDMs to the needs of particular applications is critical to avoid poor scientific inference and management outcomes. This paper aims to help modellers and users assess whether their intended SDM outputs are indeed fit for purpose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据