4.7 Article

Evolution of secondary phase particles during deformation of Al-5Ti-1B master alloy and their effect on alpha-Al grain refinement

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 34, 期 12, 页码 2297-2306

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.04.018

关键词

Equal channel angular pressing process; Secondary phases; Refinement mechanism; Grain refinement effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674077, 51474063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Addition of Al-5Ti-1B alloy to molten aluminum alloys can refine alpha-Al grains effectively and thereby improve their strength and toughness. TiAl3 and TiB2 in Al-5Ti-1B alloy are the main secondary-phase particles for refinement, while the understanding on the effect of their sizes on alpha-Al grain refinement continues to be fragmented. Therefore, Al-5Ti-1B alloys with various sizes and morphologies of the secondary-phase particles were prepared by equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Evolution of the secondary-phase particles during ECAP process and their impact on alpha-Al grain refinement were studied by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results show that during the ECAP process, micro-cracks firstly appeared inside TiAl3 particles and then gradually expanded, which resulted in continuous refinement of TiAl3 particles. In addition, micro-distribution uniformity of TiB2 particles was improved due to the impingement of TiAl3 particles to TiB2 clusters during deformation. Excessively large sizes of TiAl3 particles would reduce the number of effective heterogeneous nucleus and thus resulted in poor grain refinement effectiveness. Moreover, excessively small TiAl3 particles would reduce inhibitory factors for grain growth Q and weaken grain refinement effectiveness. Therefore, an optimal size range of 18-22 mu m for TiAl3 particles was suggested. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据