4.6 Article

Zr-MOFs based on Keggin-type polyoxometalates for photocatalytic hydrogen production

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 53, 期 17, 页码 12016-12029

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2476-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61604110]
  2. Key Technology R&D Program of Hubei Province [2015BCA253]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M572210, 2016M602376]
  4. Open Foundation of The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy [2014QN17]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Provincial China [2017CFB291]
  6. Department of Education Science Research Program of Hubei Province [Q20161110]
  7. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Process (Wuhan Institute of Technology), Ministry of Education [NRGCT201503]
  8. Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates of Province [201510488022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The porous and water-stable polyoxometalates-based Zr-MOFs PW12@UiO-NH2 was proposed for photocatalytic H-2 evolution and degradation pollutants via adopting Keggin-type polyoxometalates (POMs) into UiO-66-NH2 through a facile one-step solvothermal method. Systematically characterizations were carried out to confirm the encapsulation of Keggin-type PW12 within the cavities of porous UiO-66-NH2 without modifying its fundamental framework. Benifiting from the integration of Keggin-type PW12 units with redox activity and porous UiO-66-NH2, the results showed that enhanced photocatalytic H-2 evolution performance and RhB degradation activity for PW12@UiO-NH2 were realized compared with pristine UiO-66-NH2 under visible-light irradiation. The significant improvement of photocurrent density under a monochromatic light irradiation implied the faciliated separation procedure of photo-generated charge carriers with the incorporation of Keggin-type PW12 units. Hence, our findings reveal a novel topology POM-based MOFs which paves a way for environmental and energy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据