4.8 Article

Strengthened currents override the effect of warming on lobster larval dispersal and survival

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 4377-4386

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13063

关键词

climate change; eddy-solving ocean circulation model; larval dispersal; western boundary current

资金

  1. New South Wales (NSW) Environmental Trust [2011/RD/0022]
  2. CSIRO
  3. Western Australia Marine Science Institution
  4. ARC [DE130101336]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human-induced climate change is projected to increase ocean temperature and modify circulation patterns, with potential widespread implications for the transport and survival of planktonic larvae of marine organisms. Circulation affects the dispersal of larvae, whereas temperature impacts larval development and survival. However, the combined effect of changes in circulation and temperature on larval dispersal and survival has rarely been studied in a future climate scenario. Such understanding is crucial to predict future species distributions, anticipate ecosystem shifts and design effective management strategies. We simulate contemporary (1990s) and future (2060s) dispersal of lobster larvae using an eddy-resolving ocean model in south-eastern Australia, a region of rapid ocean warming. Here we show that the effects of changes in circulation and temperature can counter each other: ocean warming favours the survival of lobster larvae, whereas a strengthened western boundary current diminishes the supply of larvae to the coast by restricting cross-current larval dispersal. Furthermore, we find that changes in circulation have a stronger effect on connectivity patterns of lobster larvae along south-eastern Australia than ocean warming in the future climate so that the supply of larvae to the coast reduces by similar to 4% and the settlement peak shifts poleward by similar to 270km in the model simulation. Thus, ocean circulation may be one of the dominant factors contributing to climate-induced changes of species ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据