4.6 Article

Stable Isotope Tracer Analysis in Isolated Mitochondria from Mammalian Systems

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 166-183

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo4020166

关键词

mitochondria; muscle; cells; stable isotope tracer analysis; citric acid cycle; rotenone; antimycin; Neu/ErbB2; cancer; GC/MS

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-106603]
  2. Terry Fox Foundation [TFF-116128]
  3. Canada Foundation of Innovation
  4. McGill University
  5. McGill Integrated Cancer Research Training Program (MICRTP) [M219196C0G]
  6. Maysie MacSporran Studentship [F201699C10]
  7. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria are a focal point in metabolism, given that they play fundamental roles in catabolic, as well as anabolic reactions. Alterations in mitochondrial functions are often studied in whole cells, and metabolomics experiments using C-13-labeled substrates, coupled with mass isotopomer distribution analyses, represent a powerful approach to study global changes in cellular metabolic activities. However, little is known regarding the assessment of metabolic activities in isolated mitochondria using this technology. Studies on isolated mitochondria permit the evaluation of whether changes in cellular metabolic activities are due to modifications in the intrinsic properties of the mitochondria. Here, we present a streamlined approach to accurately determine C-13, as well as C-12 enrichments in isolated mitochondria from mammalian tissues or cultured cells by GC/MS. We demonstrate the relevance of this experimental approach by assessing the effects of drugs perturbing mitochondrial functions on the mass isotopomer enrichment of metabolic intermediates. Furthermore, we investigate C-13 and C-12 enrichments in mitochondria isolated from cancer cells given the emerging role of metabolic alterations in supporting tumor growth. This original method will provide a very sensitive tool to perform metabolomics studies on isolated mitochondria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据