4.1 Article

Outcomes Using Cryoablation for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Following Minimally Invasive Pectus Excavatum Repair

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0111

关键词

pectus excavatum; cryoablation; minimally invasive; epidural; patient-controlled anesthesia

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Pain is the main factor that determines the postoperative course for patients undergoing pectus bar placement. Cryoablation of the intercostal nerves has been suggested to mitigate this pain. We instituted a protocol for using intercostal cryoablation and report our early results compared to our immediately previous cohort. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing minimally invasive repair for pectus excavatum between January 1, 2017, and August 21, 2017. Demographic data, anthropometrics, operative times, type and duration of patient analgesia, and postoperative length of stay were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed with all means reportedstandard deviations. Comparisons between groups were analyzed on STATA using T-tests with a P value <.05 determined as significant. Results: Twenty-eight patients were treated for pectus excavatum during the study period with 9 (32%) undergoing cryoablation. Mean number of rib spaces ablated was 5 +/- 0.53 with no reported intraoperative complications. Mean operative time was 30 minutes longer in the cryoablation group (P=.00). Days to only oral pain medication was shorter in the cryoablation group, (1.22 +/- 0.66 day versus 2.63 +/- 0.68 day, P=.00). Length of stay, in days, was shorter in the cryoablation group (1.4 +/- 0.72 days versus 4.0 +/- 1.0 days, P=.00). There were no reported complications from cryoablation or bar placement during the study period. Days to discontinuation of oral narcotics were less in the cryoablation group (8.2 +/- 7.0 versus 18.2 +/- 10.4, P=.00). Conclusion: Cryoablation after pectus bar placement dramatically decreases narcotic usage and postoperative length of stay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据