4.1 Article

Effects of Education and Health Literacy on Postoperative Hospital Visits in Bariatric Surgery

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0093

关键词

bariatric; readmission; complication; education; literacy; emergency department

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hospital readmissions following bariatric surgery are high and it is necessary to identify modifiable risk factors to minimize this postoperative cost. We hypothesize that lower levels of education and health literacy are associated with increased risks of nonadherence, thus leading to increased emergency department (ED) visits and preventable readmissions postoperatively. Methods: Bariatric surgery patients presenting between October 2015 and December 2016 were administered a preoperative questionnaire that measured education level and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in MedicineShort Form (REALM-SF) health literacy test. The rates of postoperative ED visits and readmissions were across education levels (12th grade versus >12th grade) and health literacy scores (8th grade versus high school level). A composite hospital visit outcome was also assessed. Results: Ninety-five patients were enrolled; 23 had 12th grade level education and 7 scored 8th grade on the REALM-SF. Patients with 12th grade education were significantly more likely to have a hospital visit after surgery, compared with patients with >12th grade education (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 3.06, P=.008). No significant difference in ED visits, readmission, or hospital visits was seen when stratified by REALM-SF health literacy score. Conclusions: Lower level of education was associated with more than threefold increased risk of postoperative ED visits and readmission in our center's bariatric surgery patients. A patient's education level is a low-cost means to identify patients who are at risk for postoperative hospital visits, and who may benefit from enhanced educational efforts or more intensive postoperative follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据