4.0 Article

Meta-Analysis of Group Comparison and Meta-Analysis of Reliability Generalization of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (STAI)

期刊

REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 101-112

出版社

MINISTERIO DE SANIDAD Y CONSUMO
DOI: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000100007

关键词

Anxiety; Meta-analysis; Reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Since its creation the STAI has been cited in more than 14,000 documents, with more than 60 adaptations in different examines. In some adaptations this instrument has no clinical scores. The aim of this work is to determine if the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) has higher scores inpatients diagnosed with anxiety than in general population. In addition, we want to examine if the internal consistency is adequate in anxious patient samples. Methods: We performed a literature search in Tripdatabase, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, PyscINFO and Scholar Google, for documents published between 2008 y 2012. We selected 131 scientific articles to compare between patients diagnosed with anxiety and general population, and 25 for the generalization of reliability. For the analysis we used Cohen's d for means comparisons (random-effects method) and Cronbach's alpha for the reliability generalization (fixed-effects method). Results: In the groups comparision the differences in state anxiety (d=1.39; CI95%: 1.22-1.56) and in the trait anxiety (d=1.74; CI95%:1.56-1.91) were significants. The reliability for patients of some anxiety disorder was between 0.87 and 0.93. Conclusions: So it seems that the STAI is sensnive to the level of anxiety of the individual and reliable for patients with diagnosis of panic attack, specific phobia, social phobia, generalized social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder or acute Stress disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据