4.4 Article

Globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3) as a biomarker for cardiac variant (N215S) Fabry disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 239-247

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s10545-017-0127-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fabry disease (FD) is a multi-systemic X-linked lysosomal disorder caused by the deficient activity of alpha-galactosidase-A enzyme, which leads to accumulation of glycosphingolipids in various body tissues. The N215S mutation is a known variant of FD, with a late onset cardiac phenotype. Consensus guidelines acknowledged the use of globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb(3)) as a diagnostic marker for classical FD but its utility for cardiac variant FD is not clear. We aim to characterize the clinical features and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plasma and urinary Lyso-Gb(3) levels in N215S cardiac variant FD patients. Thirty-four FD patients with the late-onset N215S cardiac variant mutation were enrolled along with 62 classical FD patients and 109 healthy controls. Plasma and urinary Lyso-Gb(3) and its analogues were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Both FD males and females with N215S mutation showed Lyso-Gb(3) levels of (mean +/- SEM) 9.7 +/- 1.0 and 5.4 +/- 0.8 nM, respectively. These levels were significantly higher than healthy control and lower than classical FD patients (p < 0.0001). Plasma Lyso-Gb(3) levels equal to or higher than 2.7 nM yielded a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100% (AUC = 1, p < 0.0001). Cardiac involvement was frequent with 16/34 (47%) developing left ventricular hypertrophy. Three patients who underwent renal biopsy had the characteristic sphingolipid deposition in the podocytes while 6/19 (32%) had evidence of white matter changes or infarct on brain MRI. Taken together, cardiac variant N215S mutation is rather an attenuated form of classical FD. Plasma Lyso-Gb(3) is a diagnostic hallmark to differentiate N215S variant phenotype from subjects with no FD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据