3.8 Proceedings Paper

Ranking of distribution system's redesign scenarios using stochastic MCDM/A procedure

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.051

关键词

Multiple criteria stochastic ranking problem; redesign of the real-world distribution system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents the original procedure of solving a multiple criteria stochastic ranking problem consisting in the evaluation of different variants of the distribution system. The problem originates from the analysis and construction of the redesign scenarios of the existing distribution system. The authors develop a computational procedure being a combination of a traditional deterministic multiple criteria ranking method (e.g. Electre III/IV) and a classification algorithm (e.g. Bayes classifier). The proposed method is composed of six steps, including: stochastic data collection, random selection of deterministic numbers using simulation technique, solving a multiple criteria ranking problem with an application of a deterministic multiple criteria decision aiding/making (MCDM/A) method, the classification of deterministic relations between redesign scenarios (variants) to predefined classes using classification algorithm, the construction of a final ranking of redesign scenarios with an application of a spreadsheet, the recommendation of the compromise solution based on stochastic final ranking of redesign scenarios. The proposed approach is verified On the real-world analysis of the distribution system of goods which operates at the Polish electro-technical market. The results of computational experiments, including: ranking generation, classification and sensitivity analysis are demonstrated. The analysts' final recommendation of the compromise solution selection is presented. It is based on a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the system, the perspectives of its development, decision maker's preferences, results of the computational experiments and sensitivity analysis. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据