4.7 Article

Influenza Viral Shedding in a Prospective Cohort of HIV-Infected and Uninfected Children and Adults in 2 Provinces of South Africa, 2012-2014

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 218, 期 8, 页码 1228-1237

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy310

关键词

influenza; shedding; HIV; South Africa

资金

  1. National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5U51IP000155]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Prolonged shedding of influenza viruses may be associated with increased transmissibility and resistance mutation acquisition due to therapy. We compared duration and magnitude of influenza shedding between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and -uninfected individuals. Methods. A prospective cohort study during 3 influenza seasons enrolled patients with influenza-like illness and a positive influenza rapid test. Influenza viruses were detected by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Weibull accelerated failure time regression models were used to describe influenza virus shedding. Mann-Whitney U tests explored initial influenza viral loads (VL). Results. Influenza virus shedding duration was similar in 65 HIV-infected (6 days; interquartile range [IQR] 3-10) and 176 HIV-uninfected individuals (7 days; IQR 4-11; P =.97), as was initial influenza VL (HIV-uninfected 5.28 +/- 1.33 log(10) copies/mL, HIV-infected 4.73 +/- 1.68 log(10) copies/mL; P =.08). Adjusted for age, HIV-infected individuals with low CD4 counts shed influenza virus for longer than those with higher counts (adjusted hazard ratio 3.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-12.08). Discussion. A longer duration of influenza virus shedding in HIV-infected individuals with low CD4 counts may suggest a possible increased risk for transmission or viral evolution in severely immunocompromised individuals. HIV-infected individuals should be prioritized for annual influenza immunization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据