4.7 Article

NLRP3 inflammasome is involved in the recognition of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis by human dendritic cells and in the induction of Th17 cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 137-144

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.03.004

关键词

NLRP3; IL-1beta; IL-18; Dendritic cells; Paracoccidioidomycosis; Th17

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2013/24286-0, 2013/03673-6, 2008/57906-3]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [573913/2008-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate the involvement of NLRP3 in the effector functions of human dendritic cells (DCs) in response to Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast cells (Pb) and to evaluate its role in the modulation of the adaptive immune response. Methods: DCs were differentiated from purified peripheral blood monocytes and analyzed in relation to the participation of TLR-2,dectin-1, and Syk in Pb recognition, as well as, the indirect mechanisms (Reactive Oxygen Species production, endosome acidification, or K+ efflux) involved in NLRP3 inflammasome activation after the stimulus with Pb. Additionally, we analyzed the role of NLRP3 in the activation of T cells. Results: Our results demonstrated that the NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cytokines production by DCs are dependent on ROS generation, endosome acidification, and K+ efflux and involve the Pb recognition by dectin-1 and Syk phosphorylation. Our data also demonstrate that the NLRP3 inflammasome is essential for the activation/expansion of Th1/Th17 cells and its inhibition leads to an increased frequency of Th2 and Treg cells. Conclusion: Altogether our data indicated that activation of NLRP3 presents an important role in both the induction of the initial inflammatory response and in the development of the acquired immune response associated with resistance to infection. (C) 2018 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据