4.7 Article

N-doped reduced graphene oxide aerogel for the selective adsorption of oil pollutants from water: Isotherm and kinetic study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.041

关键词

Graphene aerogels; Nitrogen doped aerogels; Isotherm; Adsorption; Oil spills

资金

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI)
  2. Hamedan University of Medical Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-doped graphene aerogel with a 3D inter-connected network was synthesized using graphene oxide and pyrrole in an aqueous medium with ammonia. Hydrothermal and thermal annealing methods were employed to do it so. The structure and surface properties of the synthesized aerogel were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM), XPS, and nitrogen adsorption/desorption measurements. The prepared n-doped aerogel exhibited elevated specific surface area (340 m(2)/g), hydrophobic nature, and excellent adsorption capacity (210 g/g for crude oil removal). Adsorbent recyclability was also investigated; it is worth noting that after ten subsequent cycles, only just a negligible decrement in adsorption capacity was observed. Furthermore, the effect of salts and temperature on adsorption capacity was studied. Isotherm and kinetic studies were last examined. The conformity of various adsorption models, including Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) to the equilibrium data was evaluated among which Langmuir isotherm model gave the best fitting result. The sorption kinetics data were well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. As a consequence, oil spills adsorption using n-doped graphene aerogel is a relatively cost-effective method which can be scaled up, and it could be a promising material for removal of organic contaminants from water. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V, on behalf of The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据