4.6 Article

Isotype-Switched Autoantibodies Are Necessary To Facilitate Central Nervous System Autoimmune Disease in Aicda-/- and Ung-/- Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 201, 期 4, 页码 1119-1130

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700729

关键词

-

资金

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada [EG2683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

B cell-depleting therapies have been shown to ameliorate symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients; however, the mechanism of action remains unclear. Following priming with Ag, B cells undergo secondary diversification of their BCR, including BCR class-switch recombination (CSR) and somatic hypermutation (SHM), with both processes requiring the enzyme activation-induced (cytidine) deaminase. We previously reported that activation-induced (cytidine) deaminase is required for full clinical manifestation of disease in an animal model of MS (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; EAE) provoked by immunization with the extracellular domain of recombinant human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (hMOG). In this study, we investigated the role of CSR versus SHM in the pathogenesis of EAE. We found that passive transfer of class-switched anti-MOG IgG1 Abs into hMOG-primed Aicda(-/-) mice is sufficient to fully rescue EAE disease. In addition, we found that the nature of the Ag is an important determinant of EAE severity in Aicda(-/-) mice because the lack of a diversified BCR does not affect the induction of EAE when immunized with the extracellular domain of rat MOG. To discriminate the effect of either CSR or SHM, we induced EAE in uracil DNA glycosylase-deficient mice (Ung(-/-)) that exhibit a defect primarily in CSR. We observed that Ung(-/-) mice exhibit milder clinical disease compared with control mice, concomitant with a reduced amount of anti-MOG IgG1 class-switched Abs that preserved normal affinity. Collectively, these results indicate that CSR plays an important role in governing the incidence and severity of EAE induced with hMOG but not rat MOG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据