4.6 Article

Recombinant Human Vimentin Binds to P-Selectin and Blocks Neutrophil Capture and Rolling on Platelets and Endothelium

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 200, 期 5, 页码 1718-1726

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700784

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-116524]
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM-112806, GM-123261]
  3. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS-094280]
  4. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [I01 BX002551]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium and platelets is an early step in the acute inflammatory response. The initial process is mediated through P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) on leukocytes binding to platelets adhered to endothelium and the endothelium itself via P-selectin. Although these interactions are generally beneficial, pathologic inflammation may occur in undesirable circumstances, such as in acute lung injury (ALI) and ischemia and reperfusion injury. Therefore, the development of novel therapies to attenuate inflammation may be beneficial. In this article, we describe the potential benefit of using a recombinant human vimentin (rhVim) on reducing human leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium and platelets under shear stress. The addition of rhVim to whole blood and isolated neutrophils decreased leukocyte adhesion to endothelial and platelet monolayers. Furthermore, rhVim blocked neutrophil adhesion to P-selectin-coated surfaces. Binding assays showed that rhVim binds specifically to P-selectin and not to its counterreceptor, PSGL-1. Finally, in an endotoxin model of ALI in C57BL/ 6J mice, treatment with rhVim significantly decreased histologic findings of ALI. These data suggest a potential role for rhVim in attenuating inflammation through blocking P-selectin-PSGL-1 interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据