Comparison of different immunoassay methods to detect human anti-drug antibody using the WHO erythropoietin antibody reference panel for analytes

Development of an appropriate assay to detect anti-drug antibody (ADA) is important for assessing immtinogenicity to therapeutic protein products. However, characterizing ADA assay methods is difficult because human ADA as a reference standard is not available in most cases. We compared the analytical performance of three ligand-binding assay methods for ADA, namely, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), electrochemiluminescence (ECL), and biolayer interferometry (BLI) methods, by using the anti-erythropoietin (EPO) monoclonal antibody reference panel developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2015. Dose-dependent binding responses were observed for all nine anti-EPO antibodies in the anti-EPO panel by the SPR and BLI methods. In contrast, the ECL method did not clearly detect binding of low-affinity anti-EPO antibodies. Regarding IgG2 and IgM antibodies derived from the same clone, IgG2 exhibited a higher binding response in the SPR assay, whereas the IgM binding response was higher than that of IgG2 in the ECL assay. In the case of the BLI method, there was no consistent pattern observed in the binding responses of IgG2 or IgM. Results of the antiEPO antibody reference panel, which contains a variety of monoclonal antibodies, indicated that the ability to detect ADAs differed among these assay methods. Therefore, with ligand-binding assays, differences in assay platforms can affect the sensitivity and other characteristics of assays to detect ADAs. These results show that understanding the analytical performance of ADA assays is important for an appropriate assessment of immunogenicity. Our study also indicated the benefits of using the established human ADA reference panel to assess the assay methods for ADA detection.