4.2 Article

A simple method for measuring immune complex-mediated, Fc gamma receptor dependent antigen-specific activation of primary human T cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 454, 期 -, 页码 32-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.12.002

关键词

Immune complexes; Tetanus; Hepatitis; Antigen-specific T cell memory recall; Fc gamma R; Autoimmunity

资金

  1. UCB Pharma, Slough, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immune complex (IC) deposition of IgG containing autologous antigens has been observed in autoimmunity. This can lead to IC-mediated antigen uptake and presentation by antigen presenting cells (APC) driving T cell dependent inflammation. IgG receptors (Fc gamma Rs) have been suggested to be involved in this process. Since ICs have been linked to autoimmune diseases, interfering with IC mediated effects on APCs and subsequent auto immune T cell activation via Fc gamma R blockade may be therapeutically beneficial. However, this is currently challenging due to a lack of translatable animal models and specific human in vitro assays to study IC-driven T cell responses. Here, we developed a simple cellular assay to study IC-mediated T cell activation in vitro using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tetanus toxoid as a model antigen. We observed that tetanus ICs led to a strong induction of T cell proliferation and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which are hallmarks of chronic inflammation. This process was exacerbated when compared to tetanus toxoid challenge alone. IC mediated T cell effects were Fc gamma R dependent and inhibited by high-dose intravenous IgG (IVIg), a drug often used for the clinical treatments of autoimmune diseases. Similar effects were also seen using a hepatitis antigen. Consequently, we propose our assay as a rapid yet robust alternative to more labour-intense and time-consuming protocols, for example involving separate maturation of dendritic cells followed by T cell co-culture to study antigen specific primary T cell activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据