4.5 Article

Predictors for profound blood pressure response in patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1578-1584

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001739

关键词

predictors; renal denervation; resistant hypertension; ultrasound denervation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background:Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as treatment for hypertension shows highly variable results. Although some patients do not show any blood pressure (BP) change and in most patients a BP reduction of at least 5mmHg can be found, some show a reduction at least 20mmHg. We sought to identify predictors for such a profound BP response.Methods:Profound BP response was defined as drop of at least 20mmHg in daytime systolic ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) 3 months after catheter-based RDN. Three different denervation devices were used for RDN, and pulse wave velocity was determined invasively in a subgroup of patients.Results:One hundred and ninety consecutive patients were included in this analysis. Profound BP response was found in 33 patients. Patients with profound BP response were younger (P=0.04), presented with higher baseline ABPM values (P<0.001), were treated with ultrasound-based RDN and received more often a combined treatment with two different diuretics (P=0.005 for both). After 3 months, a treatment target of daytime BP less than 135mmHg could be achieved more frequently in patients with profound BP response (61 vs. 17%, P<0.001). Age, use of ultrasound RDN, combined diuretic therapy and baseline BP independently predicted pronounced BP reduction. A second multivariate logistic regression model including pulse wave velocity if available identified baseline BP, pulse wave velocity and use of ultrasound denervation as independent predictors for profound BP response.Conclusion:Younger vascular age, higher baseline BP, treatment with ultrasound RDN and combined diuretic therapy were found as predictors for a pronounced BP reduction following RDN, improving BP control at follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据