4.5 Article

Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 161-167

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007

关键词

Biofilms; Dry-surface biofilms; Heat sterilization; Infection control; Heat disinfection; Staphylococcus aureus

资金

  1. Macquarie University Vice Chancellor Innovation Fellowship
  2. Australian Research Council Linkage Projects Scheme [LP130100572]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP130100572] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. Aim: To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. Methods: S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Findings: Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100 degrees C for 60 min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62-74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121 degrees C for up to 30 min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134 degrees C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100 degrees C for 10 min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43-60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. Conclusion: S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions. (C) 2017 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据