期刊
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 372-376出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1049731513512374
关键词
randomized experiment; outcome study; evidence-based practice; literature review; systematic review; meta-analysis; methodology; methodological article; RCT
类别
Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard for evaluating social work interventions. However, published reports can systematically overestimate intervention effects when researchers selectively report large and significant findings. Publication bias and other types of reporting biases can be minimized through prospective trial registration that is now an accepted part of medical research. In this article, we explain how trial registration can promote ethical and valid trials in social work, and we explain how social work researchers can register trials. We conclude that journal editors should ask authors to report trial registration numbers in all reports of randomized trials in social work.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据