期刊
GEOTECHNIQUE
卷 65, 期 5, 页码 328-336出版社
ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/geot.SIP.15.P.007
关键词
earthquakes; liquefaction; sands; seismicity
资金
- US National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI 1030564, CMMI 1407428, CMMI 1435494]
- US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) grant [W912HZ-13-C-0035]
- Earthquake Commission (EQC)
- Natural Hazards Research Platform (NHRP), New Zealand
- New Zealand GeoNet project
- EQC
- GNS Science
- Land Information New Zealand (LINZ)
- Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
- Directorate For Engineering [1407428, 1435494] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
In practice, several competing liquefaction evaluation procedures (LEPs) are used to compute factors of safety against soil liquefaction, often for use within a liquefaction potential index (LPI) framework to assess liquefaction hazard. At present, the influence of the selected LEP on the accuracy of LPI hazard assessment is unknown, and the need for LEP-specific calibrations of the LPI hazard scale has never been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of three CPT-based LEPs from the literature, operating within the LPI framework, for predicting the severity of liquefaction manifestation. Utilising more than 7000 liquefaction case studies from the 2010-2011 Canterbury (NZ) earthquake sequence, this study found that: (a) the relationship between liquefaction manifestation severity and computed LPI values is LEP-specific; (b) using a calibrated, LEP-specific hazard scale, the performance of the LPI models is essentially equivalent; and (c) the existing LPI framework has inherent limitations, resulting in inconsistent severity predictions against field observations for certain soil profiles, regardless of which LEP is used. It is unlikely that revisions of the LEPs will completely resolve these erroneous assessments. Rather, a revised index which more adequately accounts for the mechanics of liquefaction manifestation is needed.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据