4.7 Article

PD-1 axis expression in musculoskeletal tumors and antitumor effect of nivolumab in osteosarcoma model of humanized mouse

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-018-0560-1

关键词

Osteosarcoma; PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2; Prognosis; Humanized mouse; Nivolumab

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81572633, 81472509]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have led to a breakthrough in solid tumor immunotherapy, but related studies on musculoskeletal tumors are few, especially for PD-L2. Methods: We examined expression of three molecular effectors of the PD-1 axis in 234 patients with musculoskeletal tumors, including osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and giant cell tumor. Survival analyses and potential mechanisms were investigated in osteosarcoma per the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and immunohistochemistry analyses. In vivo, humanized mice were used to evaluate the effect of nivolumab on osteosarcoma. Results: PD-L1, PD-L2, and PD-1 expression levels were significantly different between the histologic types of the musculoskeletal tumors. For osteosarcoma, PD-L1 was negatively correlated with prognosis, while PD-1 had a negative correlation tendency with overall survival (OS). Meanwhile, PD-L2 had a positive correlation trend with OS. Nivolumab inhibited osteosarcoma metastasis in humanized mice by increasing CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes and the cytolytic activity of CD8 lymphocytes in the lung but did not affect primary osteosarcoma growth. Conclusion: We systematically detected the expression patterns of PD-L1, PD-L2, and PD-1 in musculoskeletal tumors for the first time and demonstrated the prognostic roles and underlying mechanisms of PD-1 axis in osteosarcoma. Furthermore, PD-1 blockade could effectively control osteosarcoma pulmonary metastasis in vivo. Therefore, the PD-1 axis may be a potential immunotherapeutic target for metastatic osteosarcoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据