4.7 Article

Multifunctional photoactive and selective adsorbent for arsenite and arsenate: Evaluation of nano titanium dioxide-enabled chitosan cross-linked with copper

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 145-154

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.033

关键词

Selective; Adsorption; Chitosan; Arsenic; Photochemistry

资金

  1. NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment [ERC-1449500]
  2. EPA Science to Achieve Results [FP-91779301-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel multifunctional sorbent material of nano-titanium dioxide-enabled chitosan beads cross-linked with copper (CuTICB) is capable of photo-oxidation of As(III) to the less-toxic and more easily adsorbed As(V) in UV light and selective adsorption of arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) in the presence of phosphate, a strong adsorptive competitor and inhibitor of arsenic removal performance. CuTICB is an attractive sorbent as simultaneous photo-oxidation and adsorption reduces treatment time and cost while selective adsorption improves removal efficiency of arsenic in typical environmental conditions where competitive ions are predominant. In CuTICB, nano-titanium dioxide (n-TiO2) anatase photo-oxidizes As(III) to As(V) through generation of reactive oxygen species. Additionally, Cu-chitosan bidentate crosslinkers form through Lewis acid-base coordinate bonding between Cu(II) and chitosan amine groups resulting in cationic behavior that electrostatically favors As(V) chelation even when phosphate concentrations are orders of magnitude higher. The influence of copper and n-TiO2 loading on arsenic photo-oxidation and selective removal over phosphate was explored to optimize CuTICB design using batch experiments under varying systems conditions. For a system requiring both photo-oxidation and selective adsorption, it was found that copper and n-TiO2 act non-linearly and synergistically, where maximum loadings of both does not yield the optimal selectivity or removal efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据