4.7 Article

Efficient oxidation and sorption of arsenite using a novel titanium(IV)-manganese(IV) binary oxide sorbent

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 410-420

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.034

关键词

Ti-Mn binary oxide; Sorption; Oxidation; Arsenite; Water treatment

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0207203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478457]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology) [2016DX04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to the high toxicity and mobility, the removal of arsenite (As(III)) is significantly more difficult than arsenate (As(V)), thus representing a major challenge in arsenite-contaminated water treatment. For efficient elimination of As(III), we successfully fabricated a novel Ti-Mn binary oxide via a simultaneous oxidation and coprecipitation process. The amorphous oxide was aggregated from nanosized particles with a high specific surface area of 349.5 m(2)/g. It could effectively oxidize As(III) to As(V) and had a high As(III) sorption capacity of 107.0 mg/g. As(III) sorption occurred rapidly and equilibrium was achieved within 24 h. The kinetic data was well fitted by the pseudo-second-order equation, indicating a chemical sorption process. The material was almost independent upon the presence of competitive ions. The As(III) removal by the sorbent is a combined process coupled oxidation with sorption, where the MnO2 content is mainly responsible for oxidizing As(III) to As(V) and the formed As(V) is then adsorbed onto the surface of amorphous TiO2 content, through replacing the surface hydroxyl group or the adsorbed As(III) and forming inner-sphere surface complexes. Furthermore, the arsenic-containing oxide could be effectively regenerated and reused. The bi-functional sorbent could be used as a potentially attractive sorbent for As(III) removal in drinking water treatment and environmental remediation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据