4.7 Article

Electrochemical synthesis of ferrate(VI) using sponge iron anode and oxidative transformations of antibiotic and pesticide

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 1155-1164

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.081

关键词

Sponge iron; Ferrate; Polarization; Sulfamethoxazole; Atrazine

资金

  1. Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department [20170204016GX, 20160414011GH]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Jilin City [2015334006, 201464036]
  3. Education Department of Jilin Province [JJKH20170096KJ]
  4. Program for the Environment and Sustainability
  5. CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Passivation of anode is a main challenge in the electrochemical synthesis of ferrate(VI)((FeO42-)-O-VI, Fe(VI)). A series of electrochemical approaches were employed including polarization curve, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to analyze the physicochemical processes involved in electrochemical synthesis of Fe(VI) using sponge iron and cast iron anodes. The results demonstrate that the sponge iron anode achieved higher yield of Fe(VI) compared to grey cast iron anode. The optimum condition to generate Fe(VI) using sponge iron was 35-50 degrees C and 30 mA/cm(2). Significantly, the sponge iron anode could generate Fe(VI) for a long duration (>10h) under these conditions; possibly suitable for large scale synthesis of Fe(VI). The prepared Fe(VI) solution was used to treat antibiotic (sulfamethoxazole (SMX)) and pesticide (atrazine (ATZ)) in water. At a molar ratio of Fe(VI) to SMX as 20:1 in the pH range from 5.0 to 9.0, almost complete oxidative transformation of SMX could be obtained. Comparatively, oxidative transformation of ATZ was incomplete (similar to 70%) even when [Fe(VI)]:[ATZ] = 87 at pH 5.0-9.0. Fluorescence spectra and cytotoxicity studies suggest that the oxidative transformation products of both SMX and ATZ possess lower toxicity than the parent antibiotic and pesticide, respectively. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据