4.7 Article

A new screened microbial consortium OEM2 for lignocellulosic biomass deconstruction and chlorophenols detoxification

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 347, 期 -, 页码 341-348

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.023

关键词

Microbial consortium; Lignocellulose; Chlorophenols; Pretreatment; Detoxification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51108195]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2015A010106012, 2016A020210085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recalcitrance limits biomass application in biorefinery. It is even more so when toxic chlorophenols are present. In this study, we screened a microbial consortium, OEM2, for lignocellulose deconstruction and chlorophenols detoxification through a short-term and efficient screening process. Microbial consortium OEM2 had a good buffer capability in the cultivation process and exhibited a high xylanase activity, with over 85% hemicellulose degradation within 12 days. Throughout the treatment process, 41.5% rice straw decomposition on day 12 and around 75% chlorophenols (MCP, 2,4-DCP, 2,4,6-TCP) removal on day 9, were recorded. Moreover, Fourier translation infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis indicated that chemical bonds and groups (eg. hydrogen-bond, beta-1,4 glycosidic bond, lignin-carbohydrate cross-linking) in the rice straw were broken. Cuticle and silica layer destruction and subsequent exposed cellulose fibers were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Microbial consortium OEM2 diversity analysis by 16S rRNA gene sequencing indicated that Proteobacteria (41.3%) was the most abundant phylum and the genera Paenibacillus and Pseudomonas played an important role in the lignocellulose decomposition and chlorophenols detoxification. This study developed a faster and more efficient strategy to screen a specific microbial consortium. And the new microbial consortium, OEM2, makes lignocellulose more accessible and complex pollutants unproblematic in the further biorefinery process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据