4.7 Article

Magnetic multi-metal co-doped magnesium ferrite nanoparticles: An efficient visible light-assisted heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst synthesized from saprolite laterite ore

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 829-838

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.029

关键词

Multi-metal co-doped MgFe2O4; Saprolite laterite ore; Heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst; Hydrothermal method; Visible light assisted

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB643401, 2013AA032003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic nanoparticles of multi-metal co-doped magnesium ferrite (MgFe2O4) were synthesized from saprolite laterite ore by a hydrothermal method, and firstly proposed as a heterogeneous photon-Fenton-like catalyst for degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB). The factors that influence the degradation reaction including pH value, the concentration of H2O2 and the amount of catalyst, were systematically investigated. The doped MgFe2O4 exhibited a degradation efficiency up to 96.8%, and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies about 85.6% and 68.3%, respectively, under visible light illumination for 180 min. The high activity is mainly attributed to the high specific surface area of the catalyst and the synergistic interaction between photo-catalytic oxidation and Fenton-like oxidation. Moreover, the catalyst also showed good stability and recycling performance for degrading RhB. After five consecutive degradation cycles, the activity decayed no more than 10%. Compared to other catalysts prepared from pure chemical agents, the multi-metal co-doped MgFe2O4 is more competitive due to its high activity, good stability, ease of recollection, and especially the use of saprolite laterite ore as precursor. This work may provide a new avenue to synthesize efficient ferrite catalysts for degrading organic pollutants in wastewater by using natural minerals. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据