4.7 Article

Mercuric ion capturing by recoverable titanium carbide magnetic nanocomposite

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 811-818

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.026

关键词

Magnetic MXene; Ti3C2 T-x; Mercury remediation; Water purification

资金

  1. Ministry of Education (ME)
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [NRF-2014H1C1A1066929]
  3. ME [NRF-2016R1A2B4010431, NRF-20090093819]
  4. NRF of Korea
  5. NRF grant from the Korean government (MSIP) [NRF-2015M2A7A1000194]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) have attracted increasing attention for application in water/wastewater treatment. The functionalization of MXenes to increase their stability while demonstrating high pollutant removal can facilitate sustainable water/wastewater treatment processes. In this study, the highly stable magnetic titanium carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene,nanocomposite (MGMX nanocomposite) was successfully synthesized through a facile hydrothermal approach and was tested for aqueous-phase adsorptive removal of mercuric ions. The synthesized MGMX nanocomposite was studied using characteristic analyses, showing high stability as revealed by zeta-potential analysis and dynamic light-scattering technique. The MGMX nanocomposite presented excellent Hg(II) removal in a wide range of pH conditions, and an exceptional maximum experimental Hg(II) uptake capacity of 1128.41 mg g(-1) was observed. The adsorption behavior was investigated using the Redlich-Peterson adsorption isotherm, pseudo second-order kinetics, and thermodynamics models. In the adsorption/desorption investigation, the MGMX nanocomposite was reusable for up to five cycles of adsorption/desorption. The stability, hydrophilic nature, available adsorptive surfaces, and easy separation after reaction make the MGMX nanocomposite an efficient sorbent for the removal of toxic Hg(II) for water purification. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据