3.8 Article

Analysis of Cyclic Variability and the Effect of Dilute Combustion in a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine

期刊

SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 633-641

出版社

SAE INT
DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-1238

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE's Vehicle Technologies Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory [DE-AC0206CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pressing need to improve U.S. energy independence and reduce climate forcing fossil fuel emissions continues to motivate the development of high-efficiency internal combustion engines. A recent trend has been to downsize and turbocharge automotive spark-ignited engines coupled with direct fuel injection to improve engine efficiency while maintaining vehicle performance. In-line with recent trends in state-of-the-art engine technology, the focus of this study is lean and EGR dilute combustion in a gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. The lean and dilute operating limits are defined by combustion stability typically in terms of COV IMEP so experiments were carried out on an automotive size single-cylinder research engine to characterize combustion stability. From a 20,000 cycle sequence analysis, lean operating conditions exhibit binary high-to low-IMEP cycle sequences. This may be because the cycle-to-cycle feedback mechanisms are physically limited to one or two cycles. Longer sequences are observed with EGR likely because the EGR loop introduces a much longer transient feedback mechanism. Results from a sensitivity study with induced variability show that COV IMEP is far less sensitive to ignition perturbation than to injection perturbation while the sensitivity is similar in terms of efficiency. This is true for both lean and EGR dilute operation; however, one difference that stands out with EGR is the sensitivity of COV IMEP to ignition perturbation. Increased sensitivity to ignition perturbation is likely the result of longer ignition delay which is critical for early flame kernel development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据